Print Friendly and PDF

2020 Election: The Stock Market Reaction

As we head into election day, investors are understandably wondering – and even anxious – about how the U.S. presidential election will affect the financial markets, note the editors of Kiplinger's Personal Finance. It’s important to remember that this year, especially, the election isn’t the only market driver, or even the main one. “Clearly there’s going to be a market impact from this election, but some of what impacts the market will be decided by a slew of other things beyond who’s at the top of the ticket,” says Ed Mills, a Washington policy analyst with investment firm Raymond James. “Where are we on the economy?”

As the answers to those questions unfold, investors can at least look to history for some clues about the stock market. The four-year presidential market cycle is well known on Wall Street. During a presidential term, markets do best in the third and fourth years – election year and the year preceding it. Politicians tackle unpleasant tasks – a rate or tax hike, say – early on but prime the pump as the election approaches.

Donald Trump’s term has been anything but average. Trump years one and three (2017 and 2019) far outstripped the average price gain in the S&P 500 index for comparable years, going back to Franklin Roosevelt’s term beginning in 1941 through Barack Obama’s presidency, ending in 2016. Trump years two and four have underperformed the average. The question is whether the market’s recent upward trajectory will continue long enough to bring this election year up to average or beyond.

Beware of conventional wisdom that says Wall Street favors business-friendly Republicans at the helm. Since 1928, annualized total returns for the S&P 500 have averaged 13.3% under Democrats, compared with 7.7% under Republicans, according to InvesTech Research.

Whoever wins will fill top positions at the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Reserve, important decisions for financial markets. As for the candidates’ policies, both party platforms remain sketchy on details in parts. A win by either side could mean different things for different portions of the market. Here are the issues that are likely to have the biggest impact.

Corporate Taxes. In 2017, Trump (and a Republican-controlled Congress) cut corporate tax rates from 35% to 21%, spurring profits. If he wins a second term, corporate tax rates will stay the same and S&P 500 earnings could jump 30% in 2021 from 2020, say Credit Suisse analysts.

Biden would seek to raise the corporate tax rate to 28%, which could reduce earnings per share in the S&P 500 by 8% to 12% in 2021, according to estimates from Northern Trust. “Any tax increase is a negative for the markets, but it’s part of a complicated ecosystem,” says Northern Trust’s chief investment officer, Katie Nixon. Biden might spur growth in certain sectors by spending the extra tax dollars on climate, health care and infrastructure initiatives, among others, which could offset the one-time hit of a higher corporate tax rate. And a Democratic administration would be more robust in fiscal stimulus spending to support the economy, says Mills at Raymond James.

Even so, the impact of any tax hike would vary across sectors and even within them. The biggest winners of Trump’s tax cut in 2017 – financials, consumer-oriented stocks and shares of communication services firms, which surged as earnings expectations rose – stand to get dinged if tax rates rise. At the other end, utilities and real estate firms benefited less from Trump’s cuts, which bodes well for these sectors should Biden get his increase to 28%.

Biden has other tax changes on his wish list that could disproportionately hit information technology and health care stocks, says Ron Graziano, head of global accounting and tax research at Credit Suisse. Those changes including a doubling of tax rates, from 10.5% to 21%, that multinational companies pay on earnings from intellectual property held or used by foreign subsidiaries.

Altogether, Biden’s tax proposals could weigh heavily on the stock market, given the hit to corporate profits. Firms with strong balance sheets that generate steady cash and profits “have a proven ability to manage, absorb and sidestep potential negative tax issues,” says Graziano.

High-quality companies such as Home Depot (NYSE: HD), JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) and Nike (NYSE: NKE) are examples. But Biden may have to wait on tax hikes. “With a soft economy, a big initiative on higher taxes is not how I anticipate things starting off,” says Jonathan Golub, chief stock strategist at Credit Suisse.

Trade With China. Everyone wants to level the playing field with China, safeguarding the intellectual property of U.S. companies and boosting competition between nations on manufacturing and trade. Trump has taken an us-against-them approach, levying tariffs, but Biden would likely use diplomatic and political pressure to take on China by forming a united front with Europe and Japan.

No matter the approach, the cold war is here to stay. “China wants to dominate global technology and we don’t want them to,” says Nixon. “There’s no answer to that dilemma.” Navigate the divide by making sure your portfolio has exposure to both China and U.S. stocks.

Infrastructure. Both sides agree that infrastructure spending is needed, and the passage of any plan would be a big win for industrials and materials companies, including Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT), Vulcan Materials (NYSE: VMC) and U.S. Concrete (Nasdaq: USCR).

But the parties disagree on how to pay for it. Trump’s 2018 plan called for mostly private-sector funding. (He has a $1 trillion plan in the works, but funding details are still unclear.) Biden’s $2 trillion plan would be federally funded, in part by higher corporate taxes.

Although repairing crumbling roads and bridges and investing in 5G wireless and rural broadband are on the to-do list of both sides, some of Biden’s initiatives – increased mass transit and a high-speed rail network – tilt toward lowering our reliance on fossil fuels. Trump’s first-term initiatives, on the other hand, have encouraged fossil-fuel production. The biggest hurdle for infrastructure initiatives is timing, given the struggling economy. The impact on growth tends to be watered down if a program takes years to play out, says Wells Fargo Investment Institute market strategist Gary Schlossberg. Lawmakers may decide to focus on initiatives that produce instant economic results.

Financials. A Trump win would mean a rally in financial stocks. His campaign website catalogs dozens of regulations eased or removed across sectors, including financials, since taking office. Some moves weakened large parts of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law, enacted after the 2008 financial crisis.

Trump, for instance, with bipartisan support, raised the asset threshold for banks that are exempt from some federal oversight – such as stress tests that can help determine whether a bank has the capital to withstand an economic or financial crisis – from $50 billion to $250 billion.

A Biden presidency would shore up the Dodd-Frank regulations again. But re-regulation isn’t new regulation. Financial services firms have the architecture to adapt. They’re “not starting from a dead stop,” says Nixon.

HealthCare. Biden wants to expand coverage of the Affordable Care Act; Trump wants to abolish the health care law. Both positions create uncertainty that could weigh on health care stock prices.

One area of agreement: lowering drug prices. Trump proposed a rule last year to allow Americans to import some prescription drugs at lower prices from Canada. Biden supports lowering drug prices to match those of other nations, among other proposals.

Innovative drug and medical device stocks are less vulnerable to battles over the ACA and drug prices. You’ll find examples in exchange-traded funds such as iShares US Medical Devices and SPDR S&P Biotech. Hospitals, big winners under the ACA, face the most risk with any uncertainty about the health care law.

Energy and Climate. If reelected, Trump would continue to strip away energy regulations and encourage fossil-fuel production. That would lift the energy industry, hobbled this year after a dispute between Saudi Arabia and Russia over limiting oil supply coincided with a pandemic-related fall in demand.

A Biden administration would focus on clean energy and lower emissions standards, among other things, in the name of combating climate change. His $2 trillion clean-energy and infrastructure plan hopes to achieve an emissions-free power sector by 2035 and invest in game-changing clean-energy technologies. That bodes well for green investing strategies, particularly in renewable energy.

Editor’s Note: Sandra Block, Lisa Gerstner, Nellie S. Huang and Anne Smith contributed to this story. For more on this and similar money topics, visit Kiplinger’s Personal Finance magazine, www.Kiplinger.com.

The Bull & Bear Financial Report

Copyright 2020 - 22 || All Rights Reserved
Reproduction in whole or part is strictly prohibited
without prior written permission.


NOTE: The Bull & Bear Financial Report does not itself endorse or guarantee
the accuracy or reliability of information, statements or opinions
expressed by any individuals or organizations posted on this site


The Bull & Bear Financial Report is published by
BULL & BEAR MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Editor@TheBullandBear.com

Website Designed & Maintained by Gemini Communications

PLEASE READ DISCLAIMER